|
Pre-1989 Albanian
Rule in Kosovo Discriminated Against ALL non-Albanian Minorities
Why is there Civil War in Kosovo, Why Did Clinton Get Involved and
What has Been Accomplished?
1
2 3
4 6
7 8
9 10
p5
The suspicion among many
in the world is that Mrs. Albright's real reason for the war was
to establish total U.S. hegemony over the Balkans and its land routes
to the oilfields of the Middle East and Central Asia. Active Western
collusion, initially led by Germany, in the breakup of Yugoslavia
has converted Slovenia, Croatia, and the Muslim-Croat Confederation
in Bosnia into client states of the U.S., established a NATO military
presence with bases in Bosnia, enabled NATO to land troops in Macedonia,
and is now enabling NATO to put troops and military bases in Albania.
Only Yugoslavia stands in the way of total U.S. domination of the
region, which Rambouillet would have achieved. This was part of
Mr. Clinton's New World Order.
It has also been pointed
out that Kosovo proper is extremely rich in minerals, has some of
the largest coal reserves in Europe, and has petroleum reserves
potentially as vast as those in the Caspian Sea area. Its minerals
may be worth $3 trillion. These facts may explain the very explicit
statements in the Rambouillet Accord that the economy of Kosovo
had to be organized along economic lines dictated by the U.S., which
would open the province up to American investors.
In our propaganda to
get rid of Milosevich, we fail to note that he was elected President
in an open election in which his own party controls only 35 percent
of the seats in the Yugoslav parliament. In the last election, the
U. S. preferred him because his principal opponent was considered
an ultranationalist. The Yugoslav parliament itself rejected the
Rambouillet Accord. The unrest in Kosovo that he has been trying
to deal with has existed in various manifestations since at least
the 1920s. Milosevich has attacked no neighbors nor engaged in any
terrorist activities around the world. He is not manufacturing weapons
of mass destruction.
The assistance that
Milosevich provided the Serbs of Croatia and Bosnia when Yugoslavia
was breaking up must be understood in the context of what was in
effect a civil war within Yugoslavia, where Serbs had justifiable
reasons to fear a recrudescence of the genocide and ethnic cleansing
of the 1940s by Croats and Bosnian Muslims, who massacred more than
600,000 Serbian non-combatants during World War II.
Franjo Tudjman, the
current president of Croatia, has resurrected the flag, other national
symbols, and even the uniforms and arm bands of the Croatian fascists
of World War II. He declared a few years ago that the Jewish Holocaust
was a fabrication, and he destroyed all records of the notorious
Croatian concentration camp at Jasenovac in Bosnia, where tens of
thousand of Jews, Gypsies, and Serbs perished in the 1940s. In 1995,
with the assistance of the CIA and American military advisers, he
drove several hundred thousand Serbs from their ancestral homes
in Croatia where they had lived since the fifteenth century. The
U.S. cooperated in this act of ethnic cleansing.
Alija Izetbegovich,
the Muslim fundamentalist leader in Bosnia, helped organize the
notorious Muslim Waffen SS "Handzar Division" during World
War II. Officered by Germans, the division slaughtered thousands
of Bosnian Serb civilians before going off to Russia to fight for
the Nazis. When declaring Bosnia's independence from Yugoslavia,
he obtained military assistance from Iran and brought in Muslim
mujehadeen from the Middle East to fight on his behalf. Tudjman
and Izetbegovich have been the U.S.'s friends in the Balkans.
In fact, there are currently
more than 700,000 Serb refugees from Croatia and Bosnia living in
what is left of Yugoslavia after being driven from homes they had
lived in since the fifteenth century or earlier. No Western TV crews
filmed their plight or interviewed them about the atrocities they
had suffered. No international relief agencies have come to their
assistance. Yugoslavia has had to absorb them while under an economic
embargo since 1992.
Next
Page Previous
Page
|